Final Exam

20 December
15.30 to 17.30 (that’s 3:30 to 5:30 pm)
#302 Valikhanov

To remind everyone, the final exam will be held at the time and location above. Do not miss the exam!

The format will be similar to our midterm quiz: a combination of multiple choice, matching, and fill-in questions.

The exam covers material from the entire term. To review, look over material from the course weblog, focusing in particular on entries marked with the Concepts and Terms tag. Also be sure to review required readings. Look over your answers to the midterm quiz and the quiz answer key I handed out. And be sure to focus most on the things we addressed most in class. Though I may ask a question that requires you knowing what a particular tool is (i.e. “What is a trackback/ping?”), I will not require you on the exam to describe how to do technical tasks on your WordPress sites.

Here are some basic rules for the exam.

  • Please keep at least one empty seat between you and any other class member.
  • You must bring a pen or pencil with you to the exam. Just in case, it is a good idea to bring an extra.
  • You may bring a printed dictionary with you to the exam so long as there are no written notes in it. You may not use electronic dictionaries.
  • No discussion during the exam. If you have a question, ask me.

Our in-class review happens on Monday 10 December. As we discussed, you should come to class prepared to ask questions.

Thanks to all of you for your contributions to the course, and good luck on your remaining work for the term!

Individual Weblog Assignment: Project Responses

Your last assignments for your individual weblog (not the group weblog) are as follows:

Next week we will have daily presentations on the group weblog projects done by class participants. On each day of presentations (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) your assignment is to write a brief entry (one or two paragraphs) commenting substantively on one (or both) of the projects presented in class that day.

“Commenting substantively” means write a bit more than, “Great site, guys!” If you think the site is great, say why. If you have a question or comment, share it. Be sure to make a link from your entry to one of the entries at the group site(s) you are discussing (so it creates a “ping” at that site).

At the end of next week, each person in class should have three new, brief entries reacting to other classmates’ group sites/presentations.

As always, be sure to check both your group and individual blogs, using the links provided on our links page, to be sure they look the way you intend.

Crowdsourcing

There has increasing discussion in recent years, in academia, in business, and in popular discourse, about the importance of social and technological networks for producing, evaluating, and disseminating information. Crowdsourcing is one example of a term that draws on network theory to describe (and also to advocate) new ways of producing information using socio-technical networks.

At the Crowdsourcing weblog, Jeff Howe defines the term as follows:

“Crowdsourcing is the act of taking a job traditionally performed by a designated agent (usually an employee) and outsourcing it to an undefined, generally large group of people in the form of an open call.”

The term draws on the idea of outsourcing: an organization turning to sources outside the organization in order to carry out essential organizational tasks. For example, a car manufacturer might outsource some (or all) of the production tasks involved in constructing a particular car to factories owned by someone else, often located in a foreign country where production costs are lower.

Crowdsourcing is closely connected to the ideas of open source and collaborative production. It also relies on research into social networks (recently given the popular term The Wisdom of Crowds) that suggests that the collective judgment of diverse groups of people acting independently often produces better decisions than any single individuals in the group, including experts.

New information technologies are not required for taking advantage of “the wisdom of crowds” or for engaging in crowdsourcing, but the design of many NITs can help promote the independent collaboration these ideas rely on.

Today in class we will discuss the idea of crowdsourcing and look at a few examples of crowdsourcing in action:

NITs, Surveillance, and Monitoring

In many respects, the same fundamental characteristics that make NITs good at giving users the opportunity to produce information and to collaborate online also make NITs good at monitoring and tracking what users are doing online.

Remember the major characteristics of New Information Technologies. They are:

  • Digital: Information is converted into computer-readable formats consisting of electronic signals. Digitization makes information compact (meaning it can be transmitted quickly and stored easily), easily duplicated and uniform (information formats are the same as far as the computer is concerned).
  • Networked: Linked in an inter-connected and inter-dependent system.
  • Interactive: Communication is generally two-way rather than one-way.
  • Socio-Technical: The characteristics of the system are based both on technical elements (what tools can do) and on social elements (what people choose to do or to allow).

We have seen how digitization allows users to communicate quickly and effectively, with a variety of formats; how networking and interactivity allow them to communicate individually (one to one) or collectively (one to many or many to many) to anyone on the network, and how communities can contribute to or be promoted by online communication.

Now consider the following:

  • Interactivity: Whenever you go online, your computer is engaged in two-way communication with any other computer you try to connect to, and also with intermediary computers (the ones between you and the computer you are connecting to). Everything you do online, every site you visit, every email you send, requires a two-way sharing of information. This is a fundamental characteristic of how the internet works.
  • Networking: Computer networks allow individual computers to connect individual users through that network. In turn, multiple networks are interconnected. Anytime you enter a local network or use that network to connect to another network, information about what you are doing is by necessity shared across those networks.
  • Digitization: Because digital information is computer-readable, it is easy to save and easy to analyze. Anytime you search for a particular term in a search engine, every time you visit a particular web address, anytime you download a particular file or type of file, your action creates a “digital footprint,” a record of what you did. For someone with access to the records of what is done on your network, it would be relatively simple to set up a program to notify the network administrator of when you took a particular action and call attention of administrators to that fact. Digitization means that much surveillance can be done without direct human intervention.
  • Socio-Technical Networks: A computer system is not just a collection of machines and wires. It is a managed system that is administered by people. When you go online, you are accessing the network through a system managed by someone. Often your access to the internet brings you into contact with multiple systems managed by private businesses, universities, NGOs, governments, and so on.

Common forms of internet surveillance and monitoring:

  • Monitoring internet browsing
  • Cookies
  • Monitoring email
  • Spoofing
  • Internet and email filtering
  • Blocking by Domain Name Server (DNS)
  • Blocking by Internet Protocol (IP)
  • Blocking by keywords
  • DNS hijacking

Final Exam

20 December
15.30 to 17.30 (that’s 3:30 to 5:30 pm)
#302 Valikhanov

The final exam is scheduled for 20 December, 15.30 to 17.30 in #302 Valikahnov.

The exam will cover all material from the entire course, with a focus on readings (including this weblog), course discussions, lectures and activities.

Format will combine multiple choice, fill-in, and matching.

To review, look over the course weblog, especially the material tagged with the Concepts and Terms category, and look over the course readings, which you can find (again) following the link for Required Readings in the sidebar. Also review the answers to the quiz, on the handout you received when we went over the quiz in class. Ask me if you have any questions.

There will be an opportunity for review on the last class meeting day, Monday 10 December.

Required Reading for Next Week

For Monday, please read the chapter on Internet Surveillance and Monitoring in the Digital Security and Privacy Report.

For Wednesday, please read The Rise of Crowdsourcing.

Surveillance and Surveillance Society

Looking for someone? Here is a handy GPS service to help you find them. Just punch in their phone number at this satellite tracking site.

The idea that we are living in a surveillance society is not new. George Orwell’s 1984, Mikhail Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita, and Ray Bradbury’s Farenheit 451 are just a few examples of novels that have addressed the theme. And since the discipline began, sociologists have been interested in how societies use surveillance as a means of social control.

Today we will discuss the idea of surveillance and the surveillance society.

Surveillance is:

“Purposeful, routine, systematic and focused attention paid to personal details, for the sake of control, entitlement, management, influence or protection.” (UK Information Commissioner’s Office, A Report on the Surveillance Society, p. 4)

  • Purposeful: there is a reason that can be used to justify the surveillance
  • Routine: it isn’t unusual, it happens as part of our normal lives
  • Systematic: it is planned and scheduled, not random
  • Focused: it examines details that can be linked to individuals rather than just aggregating community information

We often associate surveillance primarily with (authoritarian) governments and with technology. But although governments of all types frequently engage in surveillance, businesses and individuals do as well. And although technology is often used to carry out surveillance, it is not a requirement. In a surveillance society, however, the (often widely accepted) use of technologies to help generate and process surveillance information has the potential to fundamentally change social relationships.

“The surveillance society is a society which is organised and structured using surveillance-based techniques. To be under surveillance means having information about one’s movements and activities recorded by technologies, on behalf of the organisations and governments that structure our society. This information is then sorted, sifted and categorised, and used as a basis for decisions which affect our life chances.” (A Report on the Surveillance Society: Summary Report, p. 3)

Surveillance is not always a negative thing, and the purposes for surveillance are often widely shared in societies:

  • Law enforcement and protection of order
  • Maintaining public health
  • Ensuring efficiency management of public and private concerns

Surveillance can refer to physical observation of people or places, but it also (and increasingly) refers to gathering, sorting, and interpreting data about them. Surveillance is a pervasive part of modern life. In the United Kingdom, it is estimated that residents of major cities are photographed by surveillance cameras every five minutes on average. Many of our interactions with governments and businesses require us to provide personal data, whether with ID cards, bank teller cards, or in other forms, and this data is stored and available for a variety of uses, whether legitimate or not.

Discussion: What are some examples of surveillance you can think of? What purposes might they be meant to achieve?

Even when the purposes of surveillance may be widely shared, the surveillance can raise issues such as:

  • Violation of privacy
  • Discrimination
  • Misuse of information/abuse of authority

But the features of NITs can also easily be used to:

  • Record and monitor what we do with our computers or in any communications we engage in that travel through computers
  • Gather, collate, process and share data about us
  • Efficiently manage physical surveillance systems
    • Data Brokering: Computerized databases are used to store large amounts of information about people. Markets have emerged in which companies buy information in order to collate it and provide complex profiles of individuals.
    • RFID: Radio Frequency Identification Devices are used to store and deliver information that can be retrieved over distance (through radio signals).
    • Keystroke Monitoring Software: Special software can be used to record every keystroke on a computer keyboard.
    • Online Video Surveillance Networks: Online networks allow for easy monitoring and management of video, audio, and other surveillance systems.

Useful Links:

Final Project Presentations and Dates

In the last week of class, final project groups will do brief presentations on their project sites. These presentations should be relatively informal and should take about 15 minutes. All group members must actively participate in the presentation. Presentations should address the following:

  • How did you decide on your project idea(s)?
  • What were your sources of information? How did you choose sources or find new sources?
  • How did you build your community (of sources, readers, etc.)?
  • What successes did you have? What challenges did you face?
  • What did you learn?
  • Discussion…

Presentation dates are as follows:

  • Monday 3 December: Taste of Life and Almaty
  • Wednesday 5 December: Anihumancolor and We Love Films
  • Friday 7 December: Chikas and Be Free

Promoting your group site

Today in class we will have a play day – time to work on your project sites. Our focus today will be on building your community of readers by promoting your site. The internet is a big place and you will need to put some attention into building your profile in order to make it easier for people to find your site.

  • From your WordPress dashboard, look at “blog stats” to get an idea of who is using your site.
  • Be sure that WordPress makes your blog visible to search engines: From your dashboard, click Options and then Privacy, and then select “I would like my blog to appear in search engines…” and click “update options”.
  • Also in WordPress, under Options, Discussion, select all of the first three options under “usual settings for an article”. Under “before a comment appears” be sure that “an administrator must approve” is not checked, then click “update options”.
  • Be sure that Google is listing your site. Visit About Google for links to find if your site is listed, how to submit your URL, etc.
  • Get in the habit of linking to other sites and of asking people at other sites to link to you. One way search engines rank pages (i.e. decide which sites come first when search results are returned) is to examine the links among sites. Start by asking your colleagues in the class to link to your site from their sites.
  • Post frequently; more frequent posting generally raises search ranking results.
  • When you post entries, use links to material you refer to and make sure that the text of your link uses a term that actually helps describe the material you are linking to. In other words, if you link to the neweurasia site. Do it this way: neweurasia.net. Don’t do it this way: this site. Google prefers links that are descriptive of what they link to.
  • Try to think creatively of how you can boost your site’s popularity, even just a bit. Email friends and family and ask them to look at your site; If any of them have websites or weblogs, ask them to link to your site; As you develop your site, look for sites that address similar issues or topics–link to those sites, and ask the site owners to consider linking to your site as well.

That’s probably enough for today. We will do more of this in coming days.

Required Reading for Friday 23 November

For Friday 23 November, please read the Wired magazine article, The Surveillance Society.